RFC1014 · XDR: External Data Representation standard
XDR: External Data Representation standard
XDR is a standard for the description and encoding of data. It is useful for transferring data between different computer architectures. XDR fits into ISO presentation layer, and is roughly analogous in purpose to X.409, ISO Abstract Syntax Notation. The major difference between these two is that XDR uses implicit typing, while X.409 uses explicit typing. This RFC is distributed for information only, it does not establish a Internet standard.
IETF · RFCОфициальная английская аннотация
XDR is a standard for the description and encoding of data. It is useful for transferring data between different computer architectures. XDR fits into ISO presentation layer, and is roughly analogous in purpose to X.409, ISO Abstract Syntax Notation. The major difference between these two is that XDR uses implicit typing, while X.409 uses explicit typing. This RFC is distributed for information only, it does not establish a Internet standard.
{
"id": "RFC1014",
"number": 1014,
"title_en": "XDR: External Data Representation standard",
"title_ru": "",
"summary_ru": "",
"purpose_ru": "",
"use_ru": "",
"full_translation_path": "",
"full_translation_checked_at": "",
"full_translation_source_sha256": "",
"architect_note_ru": "",
"topics_ru": [],
"translation_state": "not_prepared",
"verification_level": "not_prepared",
"verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
"verification_note_ru": "",
"abstract_en": "XDR is a standard for the description and encoding of data. It is useful for transferring data between different computer architectures. XDR fits into ISO presentation layer, and is roughly analogous in purpose to X.409, ISO Abstract Syntax Notation. The major difference between these two is that XDR uses implicit typing, while X.409 uses explicit typing. This RFC is distributed for information only, it does not establish a Internet standard.",
"authors": [
"Sun Microsystems"
],
"organizations": [],
"publication_date": "1987-06-01",
"current_status": "UNKNOWN",
"current_status_ru": "Статус не назначен",
"publication_status": "UNKNOWN",
"publication_status_ru": "Статус не назначен",
"lifecycle": "unknown",
"lifecycle_ru": "Статус не определён",
"stream": "Legacy",
"stream_ru": "Исторический поток",
"area": "",
"area_ru": "",
"working_group": "",
"source_draft": "",
"page_count": 20,
"doi": "10.17487/RFC1014",
"keywords": [],
"formats": [
"TXT",
"HTML"
],
"relations": {
"obsoletes": [],
"obsoleted_by": [],
"updates": [],
"updated_by": [],
"is_also": [],
"see_also": []
},
"links": {
"info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1014/",
"html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1014.html",
"txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1014.txt",
"datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc1014/"
}
}