RFC1670 · Input to IPng Engineering Considerations

{
  "id": "RFC1670",
  "number": 1670,
  "title_en": "Input to IPng Engineering Considerations",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This white paper expresses some personal opinions on IPng engineering considerations, based on experience with DECnet Phase V transition. It suggests breaking down the IPng decisions and transition tasks into smaller parts so they can be tackled early by the relevant experts. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.",
  "authors": [
    "D. Heagerty"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "1994-08-01",
  "current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "current_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "lifecycle": "informational",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
  "stream": "Legacy",
  "stream_ru": "Исторический поток",
  "area": "",
  "area_ru": "",
  "working_group": "",
  "source_draft": "draft-heagerty-ipng-input-00",
  "page_count": 3,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC1670",
  "keywords": [
    "White",
    "Paper"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1670/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1670.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1670.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc1670/"
  }
}