RFC1919 · Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies

{
  "id": "RFC1919",
  "number": 1919,
  "title_en": "Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This document explains \"classical\" and \"transparent\" proxy techniques and attempts to provide rules to help determine when each proxy system may be used without causing problems. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.",
  "authors": [
    "M. Chatel"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "1996-03-01",
  "current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "current_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "lifecycle": "informational",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
  "stream": "Legacy",
  "stream_ru": "Исторический поток",
  "area": "",
  "area_ru": "",
  "working_group": "",
  "source_draft": "draft-rfced-info-chatel-00",
  "page_count": 35,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC1919",
  "keywords": [
    "firewalls",
    "security"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1919/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1919.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1919.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc1919/"
  }
}