RFC2096 · IP Forwarding Table MIB

{
  "id": "RFC2096",
  "number": 2096,
  "title_en": "IP Forwarding Table MIB",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This memo defines an update to RFC 1354. The significant difference between this MIB and RFC 1354 is the recognition (explicitly discussed but by consensus left to future work) that CIDR routes may have the same network number but different network masks. [STANDARDS-TRACK]",
  "authors": [
    "F. Baker"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "1997-01-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "superseded",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Заменён",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "ospf",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-ospf-cidr-route-mib-05",
  "page_count": 21,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC2096",
  "keywords": [
    "TABLE-MIB",
    "Management",
    "Information",
    "Base",
    "Internet",
    "Protocol",
    "OSPF"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [
      "RFC1354"
    ],
    "obsoleted_by": [
      "RFC4292"
    ],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2096/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2096.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2096.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2096/"
  }
}