IPv6 supports datagrams larger than 65535 bytes long, often referred to as jumbograms, through use of the Jumbo Payload hop-by-hop option. The UDP protocol has a 16-bit length field that keeps it from being able to make use of jumbograms, and though TCP does not have a length field, both the MSS option and the Urgent field are constrained by 16-bits. This document describes some simple changes that can be made to allow TCP and UDP to make use of IPv6 jumbograms. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
IETF · RFCОфициальная английская аннотация
IPv6 supports datagrams larger than 65535 bytes long, often referred to as jumbograms, through use of the Jumbo Payload hop-by-hop option. The UDP protocol has a 16-bit length field that keeps it from being able to make use of jumbograms, and though TCP does not have a length field, both the MSS option and the Urgent field are constrained by 16-bits. This document describes some simple changes that can be made to allow TCP and UDP to make use of IPv6 jumbograms. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
{
"id": "RFC2147",
"number": 2147,
"title_en": "TCP and UDP over IPv6 Jumbograms",
"title_ru": "",
"summary_ru": "",
"purpose_ru": "",
"use_ru": "",
"full_translation_path": "",
"full_translation_checked_at": "",
"full_translation_source_sha256": "",
"architect_note_ru": "",
"topics_ru": [],
"translation_state": "not_prepared",
"verification_level": "not_prepared",
"verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
"verification_note_ru": "",
"abstract_en": "IPv6 supports datagrams larger than 65535 bytes long, often referred to as jumbograms, through use of the Jumbo Payload hop-by-hop option. The UDP protocol has a 16-bit length field that keeps it from being able to make use of jumbograms, and though TCP does not have a length field, both the MSS option and the Urgent field are constrained by 16-bits. This document describes some simple changes that can be made to allow TCP and UDP to make use of IPv6 jumbograms. [STANDARDS-TRACK]",
"authors": [
"D. Borman"
],
"organizations": [],
"publication_date": "1997-05-01",
"current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
"current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
"publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
"publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
"lifecycle": "superseded",
"lifecycle_ru": "Заменён",
"stream": "IETF",
"stream_ru": "IETF",
"area": "int",
"area_ru": "Интернет",
"working_group": "ipngwg",
"source_draft": "draft-borman-jumbograms-00",
"page_count": 3,
"doi": "10.17487/RFC2147",
"keywords": [
"IPv6-Jumbo",
"User",
"Datagram",
"Protocol",
"Terminal",
"Control",
"Internet"
],
"formats": [
"TXT",
"HTML"
],
"relations": {
"obsoletes": [],
"obsoleted_by": [
"RFC2675"
],
"updates": [],
"updated_by": [],
"is_also": [],
"see_also": []
},
"links": {
"info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2147/",
"html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2147.html",
"txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2147.txt",
"datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2147/"
}
}