RFC2377 · Naming Plan for Internet Directory-Enabled Applications
Naming Plan for Internet Directory-Enabled Applications
Application of the conventional X.500 approach to naming has heretofore, in the experience of the authors, proven to be an obstacle to the wide deployment of directory-enabled applications on the Internet. We propose a new directory naming plan that leverages the strengths of the most popular and successful Internet naming schemes for naming objects in a hierarchical directory. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
IETF · RFCОфициальная английская аннотация
Application of the conventional X.500 approach to naming has heretofore, in the experience of the authors, proven to be an obstacle to the wide deployment of directory-enabled applications on the Internet. We propose a new directory naming plan that leverages the strengths of the most popular and successful Internet naming schemes for naming objects in a hierarchical directory. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
{
"id": "RFC2377",
"number": 2377,
"title_en": "Naming Plan for Internet Directory-Enabled Applications",
"title_ru": "",
"summary_ru": "",
"purpose_ru": "",
"use_ru": "",
"full_translation_path": "",
"full_translation_checked_at": "",
"full_translation_source_sha256": "",
"architect_note_ru": "",
"topics_ru": [],
"translation_state": "not_prepared",
"verification_level": "not_prepared",
"verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
"verification_note_ru": "",
"abstract_en": "Application of the conventional X.500 approach to naming has heretofore, in the experience of the authors, proven to be an obstacle to the wide deployment of directory-enabled applications on the Internet. We propose a new directory naming plan that leverages the strengths of the most popular and successful Internet naming schemes for naming objects in a hierarchical directory. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.",
"authors": [
"A. Grimstad",
"R. Huber",
"S. Sataluri",
"M. Wahl"
],
"organizations": [],
"publication_date": "1998-09-01",
"current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
"current_status_ru": "Информационный",
"publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
"publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
"lifecycle": "informational",
"lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
"stream": "IETF",
"stream_ru": "IETF",
"area": "app",
"area_ru": "app",
"working_group": "ids",
"source_draft": "draft-ietf-ids-dirnaming-03",
"page_count": 18,
"doi": "10.17487/RFC2377",
"keywords": [
"x.500",
"applications",
"iwps",
"white",
"pages",
"service"
],
"formats": [
"TXT",
"HTML"
],
"relations": {
"obsoletes": [],
"obsoleted_by": [],
"updates": [],
"updated_by": [
"RFC4519"
],
"is_also": [],
"see_also": []
},
"links": {
"info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2377/",
"html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2377.html",
"txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2377.txt",
"datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2377/"
}
}