⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC3021

RFC3021 · Using 31-Bit Prefixes on IPv4 Point-to-Point Links

Using 31-Bit Prefixes on IPv4 Point-to-Point Links

With ever-increasing pressure to conserve IP address space on the Internet, it makes sense to consider where relatively minor changes can be made to fielded practice to improve numbering efficiency. One such change, proposed by this document, is to halve the amount of address space assigned to point-to-point links (common throughout the Internet infrastructure) by allowing the use of 31-bit subnet masks in a very limited way. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Официальная английская аннотация

With ever-increasing pressure to conserve IP address space on the Internet, it makes sense to consider where relatively minor changes can be made to fielded practice to improve numbering efficiency. One such change, proposed by this document, is to halve the amount of address space assigned to point-to-point links (common throughout the Internet infrastructure) by allowing the use of 31-bit subnet masks in a very limited way. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2000-12-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC3021",
  "number": 3021,
  "title_en": "Using 31-Bit Prefixes on IPv4 Point-to-Point Links",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "With ever-increasing pressure to conserve IP address space on the Internet, it makes sense to consider where relatively minor changes can be made to fielded practice to improve numbering efficiency. One such change, proposed by this document, is to halve the amount of address space assigned to point-to-point links (common throughout the Internet infrastructure) by allowing the use of 31-bit subnet masks in a very limited way. [STANDARDS-TRACK]",
  "authors": [
    "A. Retana",
    "R. White",
    "V. Fuller",
    "D. McPherson"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2000-12-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "Legacy",
  "stream_ru": "Исторический поток",
  "area": "",
  "area_ru": "",
  "working_group": "",
  "source_draft": "draft-retana-31bits-03",
  "page_count": 10,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC3021",
  "keywords": [
    "IPv4",
    "internet protocol",
    "addresses",
    "subnet masks"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3021/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3021.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3021.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3021/"
  }
}