⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC3224

RFC3224 · Vendor Extensions for Service Location Protocol, Version 2

Vendor Extensions for Service Location Protocol, Version 2

This document specifies how the features of the Service Location Protocol, Version 2 allow for vendor extensibility safely, with no possibility of collisions. The specification introduces a new SLPv2 extension: The Vendor Opaque Extension. While proprietary protocol extensions are not encouraged by IETF standards, it is important that they not hinder interoperability of compliant implementations when they are undertaken. This document udpates RFC 2608, "The Service Location Protocol." [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Официальная английская аннотация

This document specifies how the features of the Service Location Protocol, Version 2 allow for vendor extensibility safely, with no possibility of collisions. The specification introduces a new SLPv2 extension: The Vendor Opaque Extension. While proprietary protocol extensions are not encouraged by IETF standards, it is important that they not hinder interoperability of compliant implementations when they are undertaken. This document udpates RFC 2608, "The Service Location Protocol." [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Связи документа

updates: RFC2608

Официальный источник · 2002-01-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC3224",
  "number": 3224,
  "title_en": "Vendor Extensions for Service Location Protocol, Version 2",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This document specifies how the features of the Service Location Protocol, Version 2 allow for vendor extensibility safely, with no possibility of collisions. The specification introduces a new SLPv2 extension: The Vendor Opaque Extension. While proprietary protocol extensions are not encouraged by IETF standards, it is important that they not hinder interoperability of compliant implementations when they are undertaken. This document udpates RFC 2608, \"The Service Location Protocol.\" [STANDARDS-TRACK]",
  "authors": [
    "E. Guttman"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2002-01-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "Legacy",
  "stream_ru": "Исторический поток",
  "area": "",
  "area_ru": "",
  "working_group": "",
  "source_draft": "draft-guttman-svrloc-vendor-ext-07",
  "page_count": 10,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC3224",
  "keywords": [
    "SLP",
    "Service Location Protocol",
    "SVRLOC",
    "opaque"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [
      "RFC2608"
    ],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3224/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3224.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3224.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3224/"
  }
}