⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC3390

RFC3390 · Increasing TCP's Initial Window

Increasing TCP's Initial Window

This document specifies an optional standard for TCP to increase the permitted initial window from one segment to roughly 4K bytes, replacing RFC 2414. This document discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the higher initial window. The document includes discussion of experiments and simulations showing that the higher initial window does not lead to congestion collapse. Finally, the document provides guidance on implementation issues.

Официальная английская аннотация

This document specifies an optional standard for TCP to increase the permitted initial window from one segment to roughly 4K bytes, replacing RFC 2414. This document discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the higher initial window. The document includes discussion of experiments and simulations showing that the higher initial window does not lead to congestion collapse. Finally, the document provides guidance on implementation issues.

Связи документа

obsoletes: RFC2414

updates: RFC2581

Официальный источник · 2002-11-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC3390",
  "number": 3390,
  "title_en": "Increasing TCP's Initial Window",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This document specifies an optional standard for TCP to increase the permitted initial window from one segment to roughly 4K bytes, replacing RFC 2414. This document discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the higher initial window. The document includes discussion of experiments and simulations showing that the higher initial window does not lead to congestion collapse. Finally, the document provides guidance on implementation issues.",
  "authors": [
    "M. Allman",
    "S. Floyd",
    "C. Partridge"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2002-11-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "wit",
  "area_ru": "Веб и транспорт Интернета",
  "working_group": "tsvwg",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-tsvwg-initwin-04",
  "page_count": 15,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC3390",
  "keywords": [
    "TCP",
    "transmission control protocol"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [
      "RFC2414"
    ],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [
      "RFC2581"
    ],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3390/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3390.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3390.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3390/"
  }
}