⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC3480

RFC3480 · Signalling Unnumbered Links in CR-LDP (Constraint-Routing Label Distribution Protocol)

Signalling Unnumbered Links in CR-LDP (Constraint-Routing Label Distribution Protocol)

Current signalling used by Multi-Protocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering (MPLS TE) does not provide support for unnumbered links. This document defines procedures and extensions to Constraint-Routing Label Distribution Protocol (CR-LDP), one of the MPLS TE signalling protocols that are needed in order to support unnumbered links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Официальная английская аннотация

Current signalling used by Multi-Protocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering (MPLS TE) does not provide support for unnumbered links. This document defines procedures and extensions to Constraint-Routing Label Distribution Protocol (CR-LDP), one of the MPLS TE signalling protocols that are needed in order to support unnumbered links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2003-02-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC3480",
  "number": 3480,
  "title_en": "Signalling Unnumbered Links in CR-LDP (Constraint-Routing Label Distribution Protocol)",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "Current signalling used by Multi-Protocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering (MPLS TE) does not provide support for unnumbered links. This document defines procedures and extensions to Constraint-Routing Label Distribution Protocol (CR-LDP), one of the MPLS TE signalling protocols that are needed in order to support unnumbered links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]",
  "authors": [
    "K. Kompella",
    "Y. Rekhter",
    "A. Kullberg"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2003-02-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "mpls",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-mpls-crldp-unnum-10",
  "page_count": 8,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC3480",
  "keywords": [
    "mpls",
    "multiprotocol label switching",
    "traffic engineering",
    "mpls-te",
    "Traffic Engineering",
    "CR-LDP",
    "Constraint-Routing Label Distribution Protocol"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3480/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3480.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3480.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3480/"
  }
}