⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC4459

RFC4459 · MTU and Fragmentation Issues with In-the-Network Tunneling

MTU and Fragmentation Issues with In-the-Network Tunneling

Tunneling techniques such as IP-in-IP when deployed in the middle of the network, typically between routers, have certain issues regarding how large packets can be handled: whether such packets would be fragmented and reassembled (and how), whether Path MTU Discovery would be used, or how this scenario could be operationally avoided. This memo justifies why this is a common, non-trivial problem, and goes on to describe the different solutions and their characteristics at some length. This memo provides information for the Internet community.

Официальная английская аннотация

Tunneling techniques such as IP-in-IP when deployed in the middle of the network, typically between routers, have certain issues regarding how large packets can be handled: whether such packets would be fragmented and reassembled (and how), whether Path MTU Discovery would be used, or how this scenario could be operationally avoided. This memo justifies why this is a common, non-trivial problem, and goes on to describe the different solutions and their characteristics at some length. This memo provides information for the Internet community.

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2006-04-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC4459",
  "number": 4459,
  "title_en": "MTU and Fragmentation Issues with In-the-Network Tunneling",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "Tunneling techniques such as IP-in-IP when deployed in the middle of the network, typically between routers, have certain issues regarding how large packets can be handled: whether such packets would be fragmented and reassembled (and how), whether Path MTU Discovery would be used, or how this scenario could be operationally avoided. This memo justifies why this is a common, non-trivial problem, and goes on to describe the different solutions and their characteristics at some length. This memo provides information for the Internet community.",
  "authors": [
    "P. Savola"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2006-04-01",
  "current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "current_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "lifecycle": "informational",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "",
  "area_ru": "",
  "working_group": "NON WORKING GROUP",
  "source_draft": "draft-savola-mtufrag-network-tunneling-05",
  "page_count": 14,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC4459",
  "keywords": [],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4459/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4459.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4459.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4459/"
  }
}