⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC5004

RFC5004 · Avoid BGP Best Path Transitions from One External to Another

Avoid BGP Best Path Transitions from One External to Another

In this document, we propose an extension to the BGP route selection rules that would avoid unnecessary best path transitions between external paths under certain conditions. The proposed extension would help the overall network stability, and more importantly, would eliminate certain BGP route oscillations in which more than one external path from one BGP speaker contributes to the churn. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Официальная английская аннотация

In this document, we propose an extension to the BGP route selection rules that would avoid unnecessary best path transitions between external paths under certain conditions. The proposed extension would help the overall network stability, and more importantly, would eliminate certain BGP route oscillations in which more than one external path from one BGP speaker contributes to the churn. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2007-09-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC5004",
  "number": 5004,
  "title_en": "Avoid BGP Best Path Transitions from One External to Another",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "In this document, we propose an extension to the BGP route selection rules that would avoid unnecessary best path transitions between external paths under certain conditions. The proposed extension would help the overall network stability, and more importantly, would eliminate certain BGP route oscillations in which more than one external path from one BGP speaker contributes to the churn. [STANDARDS-TRACK]",
  "authors": [
    "E. Chen",
    "S. Sangli"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2007-09-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "idr",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-idr-avoid-transition-05",
  "page_count": 6,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC5004",
  "keywords": [
    "border gateway protocol"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5004/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5004.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5004.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5004/"
  }
}