⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC5237

RFC5237 · IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field

IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field

This document revises the IANA guidelines for allocating new Protocol field values in IPv4 header. It modifies the rules specified in RFC 2780 by removing the Expert Review option. The change will also affect the allocation of Next Header field values in IPv6. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.

Официальная английская аннотация

This document revises the IANA guidelines for allocating new Protocol field values in IPv4 header. It modifies the rules specified in RFC 2780 by removing the Expert Review option. The change will also affect the allocation of Next Header field values in IPv6. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.

Связи документа

updates: RFC2780

is_also: BCP37

Официальный источник · 2008-02-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC5237",
  "number": 5237,
  "title_en": "IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This document revises the IANA guidelines for allocating new Protocol field values in IPv4 header. It modifies the rules specified in RFC 2780 by removing the Expert Review option. The change will also affect the allocation of Next Header field values in IPv6. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.",
  "authors": [
    "J. Arkko",
    "S. Bradner"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2008-02-01",
  "current_status": "BEST CURRENT PRACTICE",
  "current_status_ru": "Лучшая современная практика",
  "publication_status": "BEST CURRENT PRACTICE",
  "publication_status_ru": "Лучшая современная практика",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "",
  "area_ru": "",
  "working_group": "NON WORKING GROUP",
  "source_draft": "draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update-02",
  "page_count": 5,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC5237",
  "keywords": [
    "ipv4 header",
    "next header field",
    "internet",
    "assigned",
    "numbers",
    "authority",
    "IP"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [
      "RFC2780"
    ],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [
      "BCP37"
    ],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5237/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5237.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5237.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5237/"
  }
}