RFC595 · Вторые мысли в защиту Telnet Go-Ahead

{
  "id": "RFC595",
  "number": 595,
  "title_en": "Second thoughts in defense of the Telnet Go-Ahead",
  "title_ru": "Вторые мысли в защиту Telnet Go-Ahead",
  "summary_ru": "Документ посвящён аргументам в защиту механизма TELNET Go-Ahead.",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "Точные аргументы и нормативные выводы не передаются без полной проверки текста.",
  "topics_ru": [
    "TELNET",
    "Go Ahead",
    "полудуплексный режим"
  ],
  "translation_state": "bibliographic_limited",
  "verification_level": "bibliographic_limited",
  "verification_level_ru": "Библиографическая проверка; смысловая выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "По XML подтверждены название, UNKNOWN/Legacy; текст недостаточно проверен.",
  "abstract_en": "",
  "authors": [
    "W. Hathaway"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "1973-12-01",
  "current_status": "UNKNOWN",
  "current_status_ru": "Статус не назначен",
  "publication_status": "UNKNOWN",
  "publication_status_ru": "Статус не назначен",
  "lifecycle": "unknown",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Статус не определён",
  "stream": "Legacy",
  "stream_ru": "Исторический поток",
  "area": "",
  "area_ru": "",
  "working_group": "",
  "source_draft": "",
  "page_count": 5,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC595",
  "keywords": [],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc595/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc595.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc595.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc595/"
  }
}