⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC6294

RFC6294 · Survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow Label

Survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow Label

The IPv6 protocol includes a flow label in every packet header, but this field is not used in practice. This paper describes the flow label standard and discusses the implementation issues that it raises. It then describes various published proposals for using the flow label and shows that most of them are inconsistent with the standard. Methods to address this problem are briefly reviewed. We also question whether the standard should be revised. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.

Официальная английская аннотация

The IPv6 protocol includes a flow label in every packet header, but this field is not used in practice. This paper describes the flow label standard and discusses the implementation issues that it raises. It then describes various published proposals for using the flow label and shows that most of them are inconsistent with the standard. Methods to address this problem are briefly reviewed. We also question whether the standard should be revised. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2011-06-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC6294",
  "number": 6294,
  "title_en": "Survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow Label",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "The IPv6 protocol includes a flow label in every packet header, but this field is not used in practice. This paper describes the flow label standard and discusses the implementation issues that it raises. It then describes various published proposals for using the flow label and shows that most of them are inconsistent with the standard. Methods to address this problem are briefly reviewed. We also question whether the standard should be revised. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.",
  "authors": [
    "Q. Hu",
    "B. Carpenter"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2011-06-01",
  "current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "current_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "lifecycle": "informational",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
  "stream": "INDEPENDENT",
  "stream_ru": "Независимый поток",
  "area": "",
  "area_ru": "",
  "working_group": "",
  "source_draft": "draft-hu-flow-label-cases-03",
  "page_count": 18,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC6294",
  "keywords": [
    "Quality of service",
    "QoS"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6294/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6294.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6294.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6294/"
  }
}