RFC6472 · Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP
Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP
This document recommends against the use of the AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET types of the AS_PATH in BGPv4. This is done to simplify the design and implementation of BGP and to make the semantics of the originator of a route more clear. This will also simplify the design, implementation, and deployment of ongoing work in the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group. This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.
IETF · RFCОфициальная английская аннотация
This document recommends against the use of the AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET types of the AS_PATH in BGPv4. This is done to simplify the design and implementation of BGP and to make the semantics of the originator of a route more clear. This will also simplify the design, implementation, and deployment of ongoing work in the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group. This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.
{
"id": "RFC6472",
"number": 6472,
"title_en": "Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP",
"title_ru": "",
"summary_ru": "",
"purpose_ru": "",
"use_ru": "",
"full_translation_path": "",
"full_translation_checked_at": "",
"full_translation_source_sha256": "",
"architect_note_ru": "",
"topics_ru": [],
"translation_state": "not_prepared",
"verification_level": "not_prepared",
"verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
"verification_note_ru": "",
"abstract_en": "This document recommends against the use of the AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET types of the AS_PATH in BGPv4. This is done to simplify the design and implementation of BGP and to make the semantics of the originator of a route more clear. This will also simplify the design, implementation, and deployment of ongoing work in the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group. This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.",
"authors": [
"W. Kumari",
"K. Sriram"
],
"organizations": [],
"publication_date": "2011-12-01",
"current_status": "BEST CURRENT PRACTICE",
"current_status_ru": "Лучшая современная практика",
"publication_status": "BEST CURRENT PRACTICE",
"publication_status_ru": "Лучшая современная практика",
"lifecycle": "superseded",
"lifecycle_ru": "Заменён",
"stream": "IETF",
"stream_ru": "IETF",
"area": "rtg",
"area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
"working_group": "idr",
"source_draft": "draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-sets-06",
"page_count": 5,
"doi": "10.17487/RFC6472",
"keywords": [
"BGPv4",
"Operator",
"RPKI",
"Aggregation",
"Route Origin"
],
"formats": [
"TXT",
"HTML"
],
"relations": {
"obsoletes": [],
"obsoleted_by": [
"RFC9774"
],
"updates": [],
"updated_by": [],
"is_also": [
"BCP172"
],
"see_also": []
},
"links": {
"info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6472/",
"html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6472.html",
"txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6472.txt",
"datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6472/"
}
}