⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC6540

RFC6540 · IPv6 Support Required for All IP-Capable Nodes

IPv6 Support Required for All IP-Capable Nodes

Given the global lack of available IPv4 space, and limitations in IPv4 extension and transition technologies, this document advises that IPv6 support is no longer considered optional. It also cautions that there are places in existing IETF documents where the term "IP" is used in a way that could be misunderstood by implementers as the term "IP" becomes a generic that can mean IPv4 + IPv6, IPv6-only, or IPv4-only, depending on context and application. This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.

Официальная английская аннотация

Given the global lack of available IPv4 space, and limitations in IPv4 extension and transition technologies, this document advises that IPv6 support is no longer considered optional. It also cautions that there are places in existing IETF documents where the term "IP" is used in a way that could be misunderstood by implementers as the term "IP" becomes a generic that can mean IPv4 + IPv6, IPv6-only, or IPv4-only, depending on context and application. This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.

Связи документа

is_also: BCP177

Официальный источник · 2012-04-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC6540",
  "number": 6540,
  "title_en": "IPv6 Support Required for All IP-Capable Nodes",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "Given the global lack of available IPv4 space, and limitations in IPv4 extension and transition technologies, this document advises that IPv6 support is no longer considered optional. It also cautions that there are places in existing IETF documents where the term \"IP\" is used in a way that could be misunderstood by implementers as the term \"IP\" becomes a generic that can mean IPv4 + IPv6, IPv6-only, or IPv4-only, depending on context and application. This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.",
  "authors": [
    "W. George",
    "C. Donley",
    "C. Liljenstolpe",
    "L. Howard"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2012-04-01",
  "current_status": "BEST CURRENT PRACTICE",
  "current_status_ru": "Лучшая современная практика",
  "publication_status": "BEST CURRENT PRACTICE",
  "publication_status_ru": "Лучшая современная практика",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "int",
  "area_ru": "Интернет",
  "working_group": "intarea",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-02",
  "page_count": 6,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC6540",
  "keywords": [
    "IPv4",
    "requirement"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [
      "BCP177"
    ],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6540/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6540.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6540.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6540/"
  }
}