RFC6571 · Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) Applicability in Service Provider (SP) Networks
Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) Applicability in Service Provider (SP) Networks
In this document, we analyze the applicability of the Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) method of providing IP fast reroute in both the core and access parts of Service Provider networks. We consider both the link and node failure cases, and provide guidance on the applicability of LFAs to different network topologies, with special emphasis on the access parts of the network. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
IETF · RFCОфициальная английская аннотация
In this document, we analyze the applicability of the Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) method of providing IP fast reroute in both the core and access parts of Service Provider networks. We consider both the link and node failure cases, and provide guidance on the applicability of LFAs to different network topologies, with special emphasis on the access parts of the network. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
{
"id": "RFC6571",
"number": 6571,
"title_en": "Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) Applicability in Service Provider (SP) Networks",
"title_ru": "",
"summary_ru": "",
"purpose_ru": "",
"use_ru": "",
"full_translation_path": "",
"full_translation_checked_at": "",
"full_translation_source_sha256": "",
"architect_note_ru": "",
"topics_ru": [],
"translation_state": "not_prepared",
"verification_level": "not_prepared",
"verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
"verification_note_ru": "",
"abstract_en": "In this document, we analyze the applicability of the Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) method of providing IP fast reroute in both the core and access parts of Service Provider networks. We consider both the link and node failure cases, and provide guidance on the applicability of LFAs to different network topologies, with special emphasis on the access parts of the network. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.",
"authors": [
"C. Filsfils",
"P. Francois",
"M. Shand",
"B. Decraene",
"J. Uttaro",
"N. Leymann",
"M. Horneffer"
],
"organizations": [],
"publication_date": "2012-06-01",
"current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
"current_status_ru": "Информационный",
"publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
"publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
"lifecycle": "informational",
"lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
"stream": "IETF",
"stream_ru": "IETF",
"area": "rtg",
"area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
"working_group": "rtgwg",
"source_draft": "draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-06",
"page_count": 35,
"doi": "10.17487/RFC6571",
"keywords": [
"IP Fast Reroute",
"Routing Convergence",
"Network Topology",
"IS-IS",
"OSPF"
],
"formats": [
"TXT",
"HTML"
],
"relations": {
"obsoletes": [],
"obsoleted_by": [],
"updates": [],
"updated_by": [],
"is_also": [],
"see_also": []
},
"links": {
"info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6571/",
"html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6571.html",
"txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6571.txt",
"datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6571/"
}
}