⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC6571

RFC6571 · Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) Applicability in Service Provider (SP) Networks

Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) Applicability in Service Provider (SP) Networks

In this document, we analyze the applicability of the Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) method of providing IP fast reroute in both the core and access parts of Service Provider networks. We consider both the link and node failure cases, and provide guidance on the applicability of LFAs to different network topologies, with special emphasis on the access parts of the network. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.

Официальная английская аннотация

In this document, we analyze the applicability of the Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) method of providing IP fast reroute in both the core and access parts of Service Provider networks. We consider both the link and node failure cases, and provide guidance on the applicability of LFAs to different network topologies, with special emphasis on the access parts of the network. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2012-06-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC6571",
  "number": 6571,
  "title_en": "Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) Applicability in Service Provider (SP) Networks",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "In this document, we analyze the applicability of the Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) method of providing IP fast reroute in both the core and access parts of Service Provider networks. We consider both the link and node failure cases, and provide guidance on the applicability of LFAs to different network topologies, with special emphasis on the access parts of the network. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.",
  "authors": [
    "C. Filsfils",
    "P. Francois",
    "M. Shand",
    "B. Decraene",
    "J. Uttaro",
    "N. Leymann",
    "M. Horneffer"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2012-06-01",
  "current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "current_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "lifecycle": "informational",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "rtgwg",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-06",
  "page_count": 35,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC6571",
  "keywords": [
    "IP Fast Reroute",
    "Routing Convergence",
    "Network Topology",
    "IS-IS",
    "OSPF"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6571/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6571.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6571.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6571/"
  }
}