⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC6590

RFC6590 · Redaction of Potentially Sensitive Data from Mail Abuse Reports

Redaction of Potentially Sensitive Data from Mail Abuse Reports

Email messages often contain information that might be considered private or sensitive, per either regulation or social norms. When such a message becomes the subject of a report intended to be shared with other entities, the report generator may wish to redact or elide the sensitive portions of the message. This memo suggests one method for doing so effectively. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Официальная английская аннотация

Email messages often contain information that might be considered private or sensitive, per either regulation or social norms. When such a message becomes the subject of a report intended to be shared with other entities, the report generator may wish to redact or elide the sensitive portions of the message. This memo suggests one method for doing so effectively. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2012-04-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC6590",
  "number": 6590,
  "title_en": "Redaction of Potentially Sensitive Data from Mail Abuse Reports",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "Email messages often contain information that might be considered private or sensitive, per either regulation or social norms. When such a message becomes the subject of a report intended to be shared with other entities, the report generator may wish to redact or elide the sensitive portions of the message. This memo suggests one method for doing so effectively. [STANDARDS-TRACK]",
  "authors": [
    "J. Falk",
    "M. Kucherawy"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2012-04-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "app",
  "area_ru": "app",
  "working_group": "marf",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-marf-redaction-08",
  "page_count": 8,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC6590",
  "keywords": [
    "ARF",
    "MARF",
    "feedback loop",
    "spam reporting"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6590/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6590.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6590.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6590/"
  }
}