⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC7079

RFC7079 · The Pseudowire (PW) and Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results

The Pseudowire (PW) and Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results

The IETF Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) working group has defined many encapsulations of various layer 1 and layer 2 service- specific PDUs and circuit data. In most of these encapsulations, use of the Pseudowire (PW) Control Word is required. However, there are several encapsulations for which the Control Word is optional, and this optionality has been seen in practice to possibly introduce interoperability concerns between multiple implementations of those encapsulations. This survey of the Pseudowire / Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) user community was conducted to determine implementation trends and the possibility of always mandating the Control Word.

Официальная английская аннотация

The IETF Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) working group has defined many encapsulations of various layer 1 and layer 2 service- specific PDUs and circuit data. In most of these encapsulations, use of the Pseudowire (PW) Control Word is required. However, there are several encapsulations for which the Control Word is optional, and this optionality has been seen in practice to possibly introduce interoperability concerns between multiple implementations of those encapsulations. This survey of the Pseudowire / Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) user community was conducted to determine implementation trends and the possibility of always mandating the Control Word.

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2013-11-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC7079",
  "number": 7079,
  "title_en": "The Pseudowire (PW) and Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "The IETF Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) working group has defined many encapsulations of various layer 1 and layer 2 service- specific PDUs and circuit data. In most of these encapsulations, use of the Pseudowire (PW) Control Word is required. However, there are several encapsulations for which the Control Word is optional, and this optionality has been seen in practice to possibly introduce interoperability concerns between multiple implementations of those encapsulations. This survey of the Pseudowire / Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) user community was conducted to determine implementation trends and the possibility of always mandating the Control Word.",
  "authors": [
    "N. Del Regno",
    "A. Malis"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2013-11-01",
  "current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "current_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "lifecycle": "informational",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "pwe3",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-03",
  "page_count": 41,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC7079",
  "keywords": [
    "Control Word (CW)",
    "Control Channel (CC)"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7079/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7079.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7079.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7079/"
  }
}