RFC7165 · Use Cases and Requirements for JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)
Use Cases and Requirements for JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)
Many Internet applications have a need for object-based security mechanisms in addition to security mechanisms at the network layer or transport layer. For many years, the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) has provided a binary secure object format based on ASN.1. Over time, binary object encodings such as ASN.1 have become less common than text-based encodings, such as the JavaScript Object Notation (JSON). This document defines a set of use cases and requirements for a secure object format encoded using JSON, drawn from a variety of application security mechanisms currently in development.
IETF · RFCОфициальная английская аннотация
Many Internet applications have a need for object-based security mechanisms in addition to security mechanisms at the network layer or transport layer. For many years, the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) has provided a binary secure object format based on ASN.1. Over time, binary object encodings such as ASN.1 have become less common than text-based encodings, such as the JavaScript Object Notation (JSON). This document defines a set of use cases and requirements for a secure object format encoded using JSON, drawn from a variety of application security mechanisms currently in development.
{
"id": "RFC7165",
"number": 7165,
"title_en": "Use Cases and Requirements for JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)",
"title_ru": "",
"summary_ru": "",
"purpose_ru": "",
"use_ru": "",
"full_translation_path": "",
"full_translation_checked_at": "",
"full_translation_source_sha256": "",
"architect_note_ru": "",
"topics_ru": [],
"translation_state": "not_prepared",
"verification_level": "not_prepared",
"verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
"verification_note_ru": "",
"abstract_en": "Many Internet applications have a need for object-based security mechanisms in addition to security mechanisms at the network layer or transport layer. For many years, the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) has provided a binary secure object format based on ASN.1. Over time, binary object encodings such as ASN.1 have become less common than text-based encodings, such as the JavaScript Object Notation (JSON). This document defines a set of use cases and requirements for a secure object format encoded using JSON, drawn from a variety of application security mechanisms currently in development.",
"authors": [
"R. Barnes"
],
"organizations": [],
"publication_date": "2014-04-01",
"current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
"current_status_ru": "Информационный",
"publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
"publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
"lifecycle": "informational",
"lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
"stream": "IETF",
"stream_ru": "IETF",
"area": "sec",
"area_ru": "Безопасность",
"working_group": "jose",
"source_draft": "draft-ietf-jose-use-cases-06",
"page_count": 25,
"doi": "10.17487/RFC7165",
"keywords": [
"JWS",
"JWE",
"JWK",
"JWA",
"JWT",
"CMS",
"S/MIME",
"JOSE",
"XMPP",
"ALTO",
"OAuth"
],
"formats": [
"TXT",
"HTML"
],
"relations": {
"obsoletes": [],
"obsoleted_by": [],
"updates": [],
"updated_by": [],
"is_also": [],
"see_also": []
},
"links": {
"info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7165/",
"html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7165.html",
"txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7165.txt",
"datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7165/"
}
}