⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC7263

RFC7263 · An Extension to the REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Protocol to Support Direct Response Routing

An Extension to the REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Protocol to Support Direct Response Routing

This document defines an optional extension to the REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) protocol to support the direct response routing mode. RELOAD recommends symmetric recursive routing for routing messages. The new optional extension provides a shorter route for responses, thereby reducing overhead on intermediate peers. This document also describes potential cases where this extension can be used.

Официальная английская аннотация

This document defines an optional extension to the REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) protocol to support the direct response routing mode. RELOAD recommends symmetric recursive routing for routing messages. The new optional extension provides a shorter route for responses, thereby reducing overhead on intermediate peers. This document also describes potential cases where this extension can be used.

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2014-06-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC7263",
  "number": 7263,
  "title_en": "An Extension to the REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Protocol to Support Direct Response Routing",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This document defines an optional extension to the REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) protocol to support the direct response routing mode. RELOAD recommends symmetric recursive routing for routing messages. The new optional extension provides a shorter route for responses, thereby reducing overhead on intermediate peers. This document also describes potential cases where this extension can be used.",
  "authors": [
    "N. Zong",
    "X. Jiang",
    "R. Even",
    "Y. Zhang"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2014-06-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "art",
  "area_ru": "Приложения и взаимодействие в реальном времени",
  "working_group": "p2psip",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-p2psip-drr-11",
  "page_count": 20,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC7263",
  "keywords": [
    "P2P"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7263/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7263.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7263.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7263/"
  }
}