⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC7631

RFC7631 · TLV Naming in the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Generalized Packet/Message Format

TLV Naming in the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Generalized Packet/Message Format

This document reorganizes the naming of already-allocated TLV (type- length-value) types and type extensions in the "Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) Parameters" registries defined by RFC 5444 to use names appropriately. It has no consequences in terms of any protocol implementation. This document also updates the Expert Review guidelines in RFC 5444, so as to establish a policy for consistent naming of future TLV type and type extension allocations. It makes no other changes to RFC 5444.

Официальная английская аннотация

This document reorganizes the naming of already-allocated TLV (type- length-value) types and type extensions in the "Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) Parameters" registries defined by RFC 5444 to use names appropriately. It has no consequences in terms of any protocol implementation. This document also updates the Expert Review guidelines in RFC 5444, so as to establish a policy for consistent naming of future TLV type and type extension allocations. It makes no other changes to RFC 5444.

Связи документа

updates: RFC5444

updated_by: RFC7722

Официальный источник · 2015-09-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC7631",
  "number": 7631,
  "title_en": "TLV Naming in the Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Generalized Packet/Message Format",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This document reorganizes the naming of already-allocated TLV (type- length-value) types and type extensions in the \"Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) Parameters\" registries defined by RFC 5444 to use names appropriately. It has no consequences in terms of any protocol implementation. This document also updates the Expert Review guidelines in RFC 5444, so as to establish a policy for consistent naming of future TLV type and type extension allocations. It makes no other changes to RFC 5444.",
  "authors": [
    "C. Dearlove",
    "T. Clausen"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2015-09-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "manet",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-manet-tlv-naming-05",
  "page_count": 15,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC7631",
  "keywords": [
    "MANET",
    "packet",
    "message",
    "address",
    "TLV"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [
      "RFC5444"
    ],
    "updated_by": [
      "RFC7722"
    ],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7631/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7631.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7631.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7631/"
  }
}