RFC7682 · Considerations for Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) and Routing Policy Configuration
Considerations for Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) and Routing Policy Configuration
The purpose of this document is to catalog issues that influenced the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) for inter-domain routing policy specification and application in the global routing system over the past two decades. Additionally, it provides a discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day.
IETF · RFCОфициальная английская аннотация
The purpose of this document is to catalog issues that influenced the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) for inter-domain routing policy specification and application in the global routing system over the past two decades. Additionally, it provides a discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day.
{
"id": "RFC7682",
"number": 7682,
"title_en": "Considerations for Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) and Routing Policy Configuration",
"title_ru": "",
"summary_ru": "",
"purpose_ru": "",
"use_ru": "",
"full_translation_path": "",
"full_translation_checked_at": "",
"full_translation_source_sha256": "",
"architect_note_ru": "",
"topics_ru": [],
"translation_state": "not_prepared",
"verification_level": "not_prepared",
"verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
"verification_note_ru": "",
"abstract_en": "The purpose of this document is to catalog issues that influenced the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) for inter-domain routing policy specification and application in the global routing system over the past two decades. Additionally, it provides a discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day.",
"authors": [
"D. McPherson",
"S. Amante",
"E. Osterweil",
"L. Blunk",
"D. Mitchell"
],
"organizations": [],
"publication_date": "2015-12-01",
"current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
"current_status_ru": "Информационный",
"publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
"publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
"lifecycle": "informational",
"lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
"stream": "IETF",
"stream_ru": "IETF",
"area": "ops",
"area_ru": "Эксплуатация и управление",
"working_group": "grow",
"source_draft": "draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-06",
"page_count": 18,
"doi": "10.17487/RFC7682",
"keywords": [
"Resource Certification",
"Internet Routing Registry",
"IRR",
"Routing Policy Specification Language",
"RPSL"
],
"formats": [
"TXT",
"HTML"
],
"relations": {
"obsoletes": [],
"obsoleted_by": [],
"updates": [],
"updated_by": [],
"is_also": [],
"see_also": []
},
"links": {
"info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7682/",
"html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7682.html",
"txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7682.txt",
"datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7682/"
}
}