⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC7682

RFC7682 · Considerations for Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) and Routing Policy Configuration

Considerations for Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) and Routing Policy Configuration

The purpose of this document is to catalog issues that influenced the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) for inter-domain routing policy specification and application in the global routing system over the past two decades. Additionally, it provides a discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day.

Официальная английская аннотация

The purpose of this document is to catalog issues that influenced the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) for inter-domain routing policy specification and application in the global routing system over the past two decades. Additionally, it provides a discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day.

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2015-12-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC7682",
  "number": 7682,
  "title_en": "Considerations for Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) and Routing Policy Configuration",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "The purpose of this document is to catalog issues that influenced the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) for inter-domain routing policy specification and application in the global routing system over the past two decades. Additionally, it provides a discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day.",
  "authors": [
    "D. McPherson",
    "S. Amante",
    "E. Osterweil",
    "L. Blunk",
    "D. Mitchell"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2015-12-01",
  "current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "current_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "lifecycle": "informational",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "ops",
  "area_ru": "Эксплуатация и управление",
  "working_group": "grow",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-06",
  "page_count": 18,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC7682",
  "keywords": [
    "Resource Certification",
    "Internet Routing Registry",
    "IRR",
    "Routing Policy Specification Language",
    "RPSL"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7682/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7682.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7682.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7682/"
  }
}