RFC7735 · Tracking Reviews of Documents

{
  "id": "RFC7735",
  "number": 7735,
  "title_en": "Tracking Reviews of Documents",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "Several review teams ensure specific types of review are performed on Internet-Drafts as they progress towards becoming RFCs. The tools used by these teams to assign and track reviews would benefit from tighter integration to the Datatracker. This document discusses requirements for improving those tools without disrupting current work flows.",
  "authors": [
    "R. Sparks",
    "T. Kivinen"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2016-01-01",
  "current_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "current_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "publication_status": "INFORMATIONAL",
  "publication_status_ru": "Информационный",
  "lifecycle": "informational",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Справочный",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "",
  "area_ru": "",
  "working_group": "NON WORKING GROUP",
  "source_draft": "draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-03",
  "page_count": 16,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC7735",
  "keywords": [
    "review tool requirements"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7735/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7735.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7735.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7735/"
  }
}