⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC7737

RFC7737 · Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute Reply Mode Simplification

Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute Reply Mode Simplification

The Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute use the Reply Mode field to signal the method to be used in the MPLS echo reply. This document updates the procedures for the "Reply via Specified Path" Reply Mode. The value of this Reply Mode is 5. The update creates a simple way to indicate that the reverse LSP should be used as the return path. This document also adds an optional TLV that can carry an ordered list of Reply Mode values.

Официальная английская аннотация

The Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute use the Reply Mode field to signal the method to be used in the MPLS echo reply. This document updates the procedures for the "Reply via Specified Path" Reply Mode. The value of this Reply Mode is 5. The update creates a simple way to indicate that the reverse LSP should be used as the return path. This document also adds an optional TLV that can carry an ordered list of Reply Mode values.

Связи документа

updates: RFC7110

Официальный источник · 2016-01-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC7737",
  "number": 7737,
  "title_en": "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute Reply Mode Simplification",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "The Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping and Traceroute use the Reply Mode field to signal the method to be used in the MPLS echo reply. This document updates the procedures for the \"Reply via Specified Path\" Reply Mode. The value of this Reply Mode is 5. The update creates a simple way to indicate that the reverse LSP should be used as the return path. This document also adds an optional TLV that can carry an ordered list of Reply Mode values.",
  "authors": [
    "N. Akiya",
    "G. Swallow",
    "C. Pignataro",
    "L. Andersson",
    "M. Chen"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2016-01-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "mpls",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-05",
  "page_count": 17,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC7737",
  "keywords": [
    "MPLS",
    "LSP Ping",
    "Reply Mode"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [
      "RFC7110"
    ],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7737/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7737.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7737.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7737/"
  }
}