RFC7775 · IS-IS Route Preference for Extended IP and IPv6 Reachability

{
  "id": "RFC7775",
  "number": 7775,
  "title_en": "IS-IS Route Preference for Extended IP and IPv6 Reachability",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "In existing specifications, the route preferences for IPv4/IPv6 Extended Reachability TLVs are not explicitly stated. There are also inconsistencies in the definition of how the up/down bit applies to route preference when the prefix advertisement appears in Level 2 Link State Protocol Data Units (LSPs). This document addresses these issues.",
  "authors": [
    "L. Ginsberg",
    "S. Litkowski",
    "S. Previdi"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2016-02-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "isis",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-isis-route-preference-02",
  "page_count": 11,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC7775",
  "keywords": [],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [
      "RFC5308"
    ],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7775/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7775.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7775.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7775/"
  }
}