⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC7916

RFC7916 · Operational Management of Loop-Free Alternates

Operational Management of Loop-Free Alternates

Loop-Free Alternates (LFAs), as defined in RFC 5286, constitute an IP Fast Reroute (IP FRR) mechanism enabling traffic protection for IP traffic (and, by extension, MPLS LDP traffic). Following early deployment experiences, this document provides operational feedback on LFAs, highlights some limitations, and proposes a set of refinements to address those limitations. It also proposes required management specifications. This proposal is also applicable to remote-LFA solutions.

Официальная английская аннотация

Loop-Free Alternates (LFAs), as defined in RFC 5286, constitute an IP Fast Reroute (IP FRR) mechanism enabling traffic protection for IP traffic (and, by extension, MPLS LDP traffic). Following early deployment experiences, this document provides operational feedback on LFAs, highlights some limitations, and proposes a set of refinements to address those limitations. It also proposes required management specifications. This proposal is also applicable to remote-LFA solutions.

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2016-07-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC7916",
  "number": 7916,
  "title_en": "Operational Management of Loop-Free Alternates",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "Loop-Free Alternates (LFAs), as defined in RFC 5286, constitute an IP Fast Reroute (IP FRR) mechanism enabling traffic protection for IP traffic (and, by extension, MPLS LDP traffic). Following early deployment experiences, this document provides operational feedback on LFAs, highlights some limitations, and proposes a set of refinements to address those limitations. It also proposes required management specifications. This proposal is also applicable to remote-LFA solutions.",
  "authors": [
    "S. Litkowski",
    "B. Decraene",
    "C. Filsfils",
    "K. Raza",
    "M. Horneffer",
    "P. Sarkar"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2016-07-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "rtgwg",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-11",
  "page_count": 31,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC7916",
  "keywords": [
    "IGP",
    "LFA",
    "policy",
    "FRR",
    "fast reroute",
    "network planning"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7916/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7916.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7916.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7916/"
  }
}