RFC7987 · IS-IS Minimum Remaining Lifetime

{
  "id": "RFC7987",
  "number": 7987,
  "title_en": "IS-IS Minimum Remaining Lifetime",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "Corruption of the Remaining Lifetime field in a Link State Protocol Data Unit (LSP) can go undetected. In certain scenarios, this may cause or exacerbate flooding storms. It is also a possible denial-of-service attack vector. This document defines a backwards-compatible solution to this problem.",
  "authors": [
    "L. Ginsberg",
    "P. Wells",
    "B. Decraene",
    "T. Przygienda",
    "H. Gredler"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2016-10-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "isis",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime-04",
  "page_count": 9,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC7987",
  "keywords": [],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7987/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7987.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7987.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7987/"
  }
}