RFC849 · Suggestions for improved host table distribution

{
  "id": "RFC849",
  "number": 849,
  "title_en": "Suggestions for improved host table distribution",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This RFC actually is a request for comments. The issue dealt with is that of a naming registry update procedure, both as exists currently and what could exist in the future. None of the proposed solutions are intended as standards at this time; rather it is hoped that a general consensus will emerge as the appropriate solution, leaving eventually to the adoption of standards.",
  "authors": [
    "M.R. Crispin"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "1983-05-01",
  "current_status": "UNKNOWN",
  "current_status_ru": "Статус не назначен",
  "publication_status": "UNKNOWN",
  "publication_status_ru": "Статус не назначен",
  "lifecycle": "unknown",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Статус не определён",
  "stream": "Legacy",
  "stream_ru": "Исторический поток",
  "area": "",
  "area_ru": "",
  "working_group": "",
  "source_draft": "",
  "page_count": 2,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC849",
  "keywords": [],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc849/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc849.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc849.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc849/"
  }
}