⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC8547

RFC8547 · TCP-ENO: Encryption Negotiation Option

TCP-ENO: Encryption Negotiation Option

Despite growing adoption of TLS, a significant fraction of TCP traffic on the Internet remains unencrypted. The persistence of unencrypted traffic can be attributed to at least two factors. First, some legacy protocols lack a signaling mechanism (such as a STARTTLS command) by which to convey support for encryption, thus making incremental deployment impossible. Second, legacy applications themselves cannot always be upgraded and therefore require a way to implement encryption transparently entirely within the transport layer. The TCP Encryption Negotiation Option (TCP-ENO) addresses both of these problems through a new TCP option kind providing out-of-band, fully backward-compatible negotiation of encryption.

Официальная английская аннотация

Despite growing adoption of TLS, a significant fraction of TCP traffic on the Internet remains unencrypted. The persistence of unencrypted traffic can be attributed to at least two factors. First, some legacy protocols lack a signaling mechanism (such as a STARTTLS command) by which to convey support for encryption, thus making incremental deployment impossible. Second, legacy applications themselves cannot always be upgraded and therefore require a way to implement encryption transparently entirely within the transport layer. The TCP Encryption Negotiation Option (TCP-ENO) addresses both of these problems through a new TCP option kind providing out-of-band, fully backward-compatible negotiation of encryption.

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2019-05-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC8547",
  "number": 8547,
  "title_en": "TCP-ENO: Encryption Negotiation Option",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "Despite growing adoption of TLS, a significant fraction of TCP traffic on the Internet remains unencrypted. The persistence of unencrypted traffic can be attributed to at least two factors. First, some legacy protocols lack a signaling mechanism (such as a STARTTLS command) by which to convey support for encryption, thus making incremental deployment impossible. Second, legacy applications themselves cannot always be upgraded and therefore require a way to implement encryption transparently entirely within the transport layer. The TCP Encryption Negotiation Option (TCP-ENO) addresses both of these problems through a new TCP option kind providing out-of-band, fully backward-compatible negotiation of encryption.",
  "authors": [
    "A. Bittau",
    "D. Giffin",
    "M. Handley",
    "D. Mazieres",
    "E. Smith"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2019-05-01",
  "current_status": "EXPERIMENTAL",
  "current_status_ru": "Экспериментальный",
  "publication_status": "EXPERIMENTAL",
  "publication_status_ru": "Экспериментальный",
  "lifecycle": "experimental",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Экспериментальный",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "tsv",
  "area_ru": "Транспорт",
  "working_group": "tcpinc",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-19",
  "page_count": 31,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC8547",
  "keywords": [
    "tcp",
    "encryption"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8547/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8547.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8547.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8547/"
  }
}