⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC8559

RFC8559 · Dynamic Authorization Proxying in the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol

Dynamic Authorization Proxying in the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol

RFC 5176 defines Change-of-Authorization (CoA) and Disconnect Message (DM) behavior for RADIUS. RFC 5176 also suggests that proxying these messages is possible, but it does not provide guidance as to how that is done. This specification updates RFC 5176 to correct that omission for scenarios where networks use realm-based proxying as defined in RFC 7542. This specification also updates RFC 5580 to allow the Operator-Name attribute in CoA-Request and Disconnect-Request packets.

Официальная английская аннотация

RFC 5176 defines Change-of-Authorization (CoA) and Disconnect Message (DM) behavior for RADIUS. RFC 5176 also suggests that proxying these messages is possible, but it does not provide guidance as to how that is done. This specification updates RFC 5176 to correct that omission for scenarios where networks use realm-based proxying as defined in RFC 7542. This specification also updates RFC 5580 to allow the Operator-Name attribute in CoA-Request and Disconnect-Request packets.

Связи документа

updates: RFC5176, RFC5580

Официальный источник · 2019-04-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC8559",
  "number": 8559,
  "title_en": "Dynamic Authorization Proxying in the Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "RFC 5176 defines Change-of-Authorization (CoA) and Disconnect Message (DM) behavior for RADIUS. RFC 5176 also suggests that proxying these messages is possible, but it does not provide guidance as to how that is done. This specification updates RFC 5176 to correct that omission for scenarios where networks use realm-based proxying as defined in RFC 7542. This specification also updates RFC 5580 to allow the Operator-Name attribute in CoA-Request and Disconnect-Request packets.",
  "authors": [
    "A. DeKok",
    "J. Korhonen"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2019-04-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "sec",
  "area_ru": "Безопасность",
  "working_group": "radext",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-radext-coa-proxy-10",
  "page_count": 21,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC8559",
  "keywords": [
    "RADIUS",
    "Change of Authorization",
    "CoA-Request",
    "Disconnect-Request"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [
      "RFC5176",
      "RFC5580"
    ],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8559/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8559.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8559.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8559/"
  }
}