⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC8595

RFC8595 · An MPLS-Based Forwarding Plane for Service Function Chaining

An MPLS-Based Forwarding Plane for Service Function Chaining

This document describes how Service Function Chaining (SFC) can be achieved in an MPLS network by means of a logical representation of the Network Service Header (NSH) in an MPLS label stack. That is, the NSH is not used, but the fields of the NSH are mapped to fields in the MPLS label stack. This approach does not deprecate or replace the NSH, but it acknowledges that there may be a need for an interim deployment of SFC functionality in brownfield networks.

Официальная английская аннотация

This document describes how Service Function Chaining (SFC) can be achieved in an MPLS network by means of a logical representation of the Network Service Header (NSH) in an MPLS label stack. That is, the NSH is not used, but the fields of the NSH are mapped to fields in the MPLS label stack. This approach does not deprecate or replace the NSH, but it acknowledges that there may be a need for an interim deployment of SFC functionality in brownfield networks.

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2019-06-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC8595",
  "number": 8595,
  "title_en": "An MPLS-Based Forwarding Plane for Service Function Chaining",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This document describes how Service Function Chaining (SFC) can be achieved in an MPLS network by means of a logical representation of the Network Service Header (NSH) in an MPLS label stack. That is, the NSH is not used, but the fields of the NSH are mapped to fields in the MPLS label stack. This approach does not deprecate or replace the NSH, but it acknowledges that there may be a need for an interim deployment of SFC functionality in brownfield networks.",
  "authors": [
    "A. Farrel",
    "S. Bryant",
    "J. Drake"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2019-06-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "mpls",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-07",
  "page_count": 32,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC8595",
  "keywords": [
    "SFC",
    "MPLS",
    "Service Function Chaining",
    "NSH",
    "Network Service Header",
    "Multiprotocol Label Switching"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8595/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8595.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8595.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8595/"
  }
}