⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC8687

RFC8687 · OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels

OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels

When using Traffic Engineering (TE) in a dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 network, the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) TE Label Switched Path (LSP) infrastructure may be duplicated, even if the destination IPv4 and IPv6 addresses belong to the same remote router. In order to achieve an integrated MPLS TE LSP infrastructure, OSPF routes must be computed over MPLS TE tunnels created using information propagated in another OSPF instance. This issue is solved by advertising cross-address family (X-AF) OSPF TE information. This document describes an update to RFC 5786 that allows for the easy identification of a router's local X-AF IP addresses.

Официальная английская аннотация

When using Traffic Engineering (TE) in a dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 network, the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) TE Label Switched Path (LSP) infrastructure may be duplicated, even if the destination IPv4 and IPv6 addresses belong to the same remote router. In order to achieve an integrated MPLS TE LSP infrastructure, OSPF routes must be computed over MPLS TE tunnels created using information propagated in another OSPF instance. This issue is solved by advertising cross-address family (X-AF) OSPF TE information. This document describes an update to RFC 5786 that allows for the easy identification of a router's local X-AF IP addresses.

Связи документа

updates: RFC5786

Официальный источник · 2019-11-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC8687",
  "number": 8687,
  "title_en": "OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "When using Traffic Engineering (TE) in a dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 network, the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) TE Label Switched Path (LSP) infrastructure may be duplicated, even if the destination IPv4 and IPv6 addresses belong to the same remote router. In order to achieve an integrated MPLS TE LSP infrastructure, OSPF routes must be computed over MPLS TE tunnels created using information propagated in another OSPF instance. This issue is solved by advertising cross-address family (X-AF) OSPF TE information. This document describes an update to RFC 5786 that allows for the easy identification of a router's local X-AF IP addresses.",
  "authors": [
    "A. Smirnov",
    "A. Retana",
    "M. Barnes"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2019-11-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "lsr",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07",
  "page_count": 8,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC8687",
  "keywords": [
    "OSPF",
    "IPv4",
    "IPv6",
    "TE",
    "MPLS"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "HTML",
    "TXT",
    "PDF",
    "XML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [
      "RFC5786"
    ],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8687/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8687.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8687.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8687/"
  }
}