⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC8889

RFC8889 · Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring

Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring

The Alternate-Marking method, as presented in RFC 8321, can only be applied to point-to-point flows, because it assumes that all the packets of the flow measured on one node are measured again by a single second node. This document generalizes and expands this methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network -- in wider terms, a multipoint-to-multipoint network. For this reason, the technique here described is called "Multipoint Alternate Marking".

Официальная английская аннотация

The Alternate-Marking method, as presented in RFC 8321, can only be applied to point-to-point flows, because it assumes that all the packets of the flow measured on one node are measured again by a single second node. This document generalizes and expands this methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network -- in wider terms, a multipoint-to-multipoint network. For this reason, the technique here described is called "Multipoint Alternate Marking".

Связи документа

obsoleted_by: RFC9342

Официальный источник · 2020-08-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC8889",
  "number": 8889,
  "title_en": "Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "The Alternate-Marking method, as presented in RFC 8321, can only be applied to point-to-point flows, because it assumes that all the packets of the flow measured on one node are measured again by a single second node. This document generalizes and expands this methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network -- in wider terms, a multipoint-to-multipoint network. For this reason, the technique here described is called \"Multipoint Alternate Marking\".",
  "authors": [
    "G. Fioccola",
    "M. Cociglio",
    "A. Sapio",
    "R. Sisto"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2020-08-01",
  "current_status": "EXPERIMENTAL",
  "current_status_ru": "Экспериментальный",
  "publication_status": "EXPERIMENTAL",
  "publication_status_ru": "Экспериментальный",
  "lifecycle": "superseded",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Заменён",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "ops",
  "area_ru": "Эксплуатация и управление",
  "working_group": "ippm",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-09",
  "page_count": 23,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC8889",
  "keywords": [
    "Clustered Alternate Marking",
    "Multipoint Marking Method",
    "Multipoint Coloring Technique",
    "Network Clustering"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "HTML",
    "TXT",
    "PDF",
    "XML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [
      "RFC9342"
    ],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8889/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8889.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8889.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8889/"
  }
}