RFC8889 · Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring
Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring
The Alternate-Marking method, as presented in RFC 8321, can only be applied to point-to-point flows, because it assumes that all the packets of the flow measured on one node are measured again by a single second node. This document generalizes and expands this methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network -- in wider terms, a multipoint-to-multipoint network. For this reason, the technique here described is called "Multipoint Alternate Marking".
IETF · RFCОфициальная английская аннотация
The Alternate-Marking method, as presented in RFC 8321, can only be applied to point-to-point flows, because it assumes that all the packets of the flow measured on one node are measured again by a single second node. This document generalizes and expands this methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network -- in wider terms, a multipoint-to-multipoint network. For this reason, the technique here described is called "Multipoint Alternate Marking".
{
"id": "RFC8889",
"number": 8889,
"title_en": "Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring",
"title_ru": "",
"summary_ru": "",
"purpose_ru": "",
"use_ru": "",
"full_translation_path": "",
"full_translation_checked_at": "",
"full_translation_source_sha256": "",
"architect_note_ru": "",
"topics_ru": [],
"translation_state": "not_prepared",
"verification_level": "not_prepared",
"verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
"verification_note_ru": "",
"abstract_en": "The Alternate-Marking method, as presented in RFC 8321, can only be applied to point-to-point flows, because it assumes that all the packets of the flow measured on one node are measured again by a single second node. This document generalizes and expands this methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network -- in wider terms, a multipoint-to-multipoint network. For this reason, the technique here described is called \"Multipoint Alternate Marking\".",
"authors": [
"G. Fioccola",
"M. Cociglio",
"A. Sapio",
"R. Sisto"
],
"organizations": [],
"publication_date": "2020-08-01",
"current_status": "EXPERIMENTAL",
"current_status_ru": "Экспериментальный",
"publication_status": "EXPERIMENTAL",
"publication_status_ru": "Экспериментальный",
"lifecycle": "superseded",
"lifecycle_ru": "Заменён",
"stream": "IETF",
"stream_ru": "IETF",
"area": "ops",
"area_ru": "Эксплуатация и управление",
"working_group": "ippm",
"source_draft": "draft-ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark-09",
"page_count": 23,
"doi": "10.17487/RFC8889",
"keywords": [
"Clustered Alternate Marking",
"Multipoint Marking Method",
"Multipoint Coloring Technique",
"Network Clustering"
],
"formats": [
"HTML",
"TXT",
"PDF",
"XML"
],
"relations": {
"obsoletes": [],
"obsoleted_by": [
"RFC9342"
],
"updates": [],
"updated_by": [],
"is_also": [],
"see_also": []
},
"links": {
"info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8889/",
"html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8889.html",
"txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8889.txt",
"datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8889/"
}
}