⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC9177

RFC9177 · Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Block-Wise Transfer Options Supporting Robust Transmission

Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Block-Wise Transfer Options Supporting Robust Transmission

This document specifies alternative Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) block-wise transfer options: Q-Block1 and Q-Block2. These options are similar to, but distinct from, the CoAP Block1 and Block2 options defined in RFC 7959. The Q-Block1 and Q-Block2 options are not intended to replace the Block1 and Block2 options but rather have the goal of supporting Non-confirmable (NON) messages for large amounts of data with fewer packet interchanges. Also, the Q-Block1 and Q-Block2 options support faster recovery should any of the blocks get lost in transmission.

Официальная английская аннотация

This document specifies alternative Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) block-wise transfer options: Q-Block1 and Q-Block2. These options are similar to, but distinct from, the CoAP Block1 and Block2 options defined in RFC 7959. The Q-Block1 and Q-Block2 options are not intended to replace the Block1 and Block2 options but rather have the goal of supporting Non-confirmable (NON) messages for large amounts of data with fewer packet interchanges. Also, the Q-Block1 and Q-Block2 options support faster recovery should any of the blocks get lost in transmission.

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2022-03-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC9177",
  "number": 9177,
  "title_en": "Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) Block-Wise Transfer Options Supporting Robust Transmission",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This document specifies alternative Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) block-wise transfer options: Q-Block1 and Q-Block2. These options are similar to, but distinct from, the CoAP Block1 and Block2 options defined in RFC 7959. The Q-Block1 and Q-Block2 options are not intended to replace the Block1 and Block2 options but rather have the goal of supporting Non-confirmable (NON) messages for large amounts of data with fewer packet interchanges. Also, the Q-Block1 and Q-Block2 options support faster recovery should any of the blocks get lost in transmission.",
  "authors": [
    "M. Boucadair",
    "J. Shallow"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2022-03-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "wit",
  "area_ru": "Веб и транспорт Интернета",
  "working_group": "core",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-core-new-block-14",
  "page_count": 41,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC9177",
  "keywords": [
    "Quick-Block",
    "Robust-Block",
    "R-Block",
    "Tough-Block",
    "Resilient-Block",
    "Fast-Block",
    "Resilience",
    "Filtering",
    "Faster transmission",
    "Large amounts of data",
    "Less packet interchange",
    "Fast recovery",
    "DOTS"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "HTML",
    "TXT",
    "PDF",
    "XML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9177/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9177.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9177.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9177/"
  }
}