⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC930

RFC930 · Telnet terminal type option

Telnet terminal type option

This RFC specifies a standard for the ARPA Internet community. Hosts on the ARPA Internet that exchange terminal type information within the Telnet protocol are expected to adopt and implement this standard. This standard supersedes RFC-884. The only change is to specify that the TERMINAL-TYPE IS sub-negotiation should be sent only in response to the TERMINAL-TYPE SEND sub-negotiation.

Официальная английская аннотация

This RFC specifies a standard for the ARPA Internet community. Hosts on the ARPA Internet that exchange terminal type information within the Telnet protocol are expected to adopt and implement this standard. This standard supersedes RFC-884. The only change is to specify that the TERMINAL-TYPE IS sub-negotiation should be sent only in response to the TERMINAL-TYPE SEND sub-negotiation.

Связи документа

obsoletes: RFC884

obsoleted_by: RFC1091

Официальный источник · 1985-01-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC930",
  "number": 930,
  "title_en": "Telnet terminal type option",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This RFC specifies a standard for the ARPA Internet community. Hosts on the ARPA Internet that exchange terminal type information within the Telnet protocol are expected to adopt and implement this standard. This standard supersedes RFC-884. The only change is to specify that the TERMINAL-TYPE IS sub-negotiation should be sent only in response to the TERMINAL-TYPE SEND sub-negotiation.",
  "authors": [
    "M. Solomon",
    "E. Wimmers"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "1985-01-01",
  "current_status": "UNKNOWN",
  "current_status_ru": "Статус не назначен",
  "publication_status": "UNKNOWN",
  "publication_status_ru": "Статус не назначен",
  "lifecycle": "superseded",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Заменён",
  "stream": "Legacy",
  "stream_ru": "Исторический поток",
  "area": "",
  "area_ru": "",
  "working_group": "",
  "source_draft": "",
  "page_count": 4,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC930",
  "keywords": [],
  "formats": [
    "TXT",
    "HTML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [
      "RFC884"
    ],
    "obsoleted_by": [
      "RFC1091"
    ],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc930/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc930.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc930.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc930/"
  }
}