⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC9341

RFC9341 · Alternate-Marking Method

Alternate-Marking Method

This document describes the Alternate-Marking technique to perform packet loss, delay, and jitter measurements on live traffic. This technology can be applied in various situations and for different protocols. According to the classification defined in RFC 7799, it could be considered Passive or Hybrid depending on the application. This document obsoletes RFC 8321.

Официальная английская аннотация

This document describes the Alternate-Marking technique to perform packet loss, delay, and jitter measurements on live traffic. This technology can be applied in various situations and for different protocols. According to the classification defined in RFC 7799, it could be considered Passive or Hybrid depending on the application. This document obsoletes RFC 8321.

Связи документа

obsoletes: RFC8321

Официальный источник · 2022-12-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC9341",
  "number": 9341,
  "title_en": "Alternate-Marking Method",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This document describes the Alternate-Marking technique to perform packet loss, delay, and jitter measurements on live traffic. This technology can be applied in various situations and for different protocols. According to the classification defined in RFC 7799, it could be considered Passive or Hybrid depending on the application. This document obsoletes RFC 8321.",
  "authors": [
    "G. Fioccola",
    "M. Cociglio",
    "G. Mirsky",
    "T. Mizrahi",
    "T. Zhou"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2022-12-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "ops",
  "area_ru": "Эксплуатация и управление",
  "working_group": "ippm",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8321bis-03",
  "page_count": 22,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC9341",
  "keywords": [],
  "formats": [
    "HTML",
    "TXT",
    "PDF",
    "XML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [
      "RFC8321"
    ],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9341/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9341.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9341.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9341/"
  }
}