⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC9342

RFC9342 · Clustered Alternate-Marking Method

Clustered Alternate-Marking Method

This document generalizes and expands the Alternate-Marking methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network; this can result in a multipoint-to-multipoint network. The network clustering approach is presented and, for this reason, the technique described here is called "Clustered Alternate Marking". This document obsoletes RFC 8889.

Официальная английская аннотация

This document generalizes and expands the Alternate-Marking methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network; this can result in a multipoint-to-multipoint network. The network clustering approach is presented and, for this reason, the technique described here is called "Clustered Alternate Marking". This document obsoletes RFC 8889.

Связи документа

obsoletes: RFC8889

Официальный источник · 2022-12-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC9342",
  "number": 9342,
  "title_en": "Clustered Alternate-Marking Method",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This document generalizes and expands the Alternate-Marking methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network; this can result in a multipoint-to-multipoint network. The network clustering approach is presented and, for this reason, the technique described here is called \"Clustered Alternate Marking\". This document obsoletes RFC 8889.",
  "authors": [
    "G. Fioccola",
    "M. Cociglio",
    "A. Sapio",
    "R. Sisto",
    "T. Zhou"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2022-12-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "ops",
  "area_ru": "Эксплуатация и управление",
  "working_group": "ippm",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-04",
  "page_count": 24,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC9342",
  "keywords": [
    "Multipoint",
    "Cluster",
    "Performance",
    "Measurement",
    "Monitoring",
    "Passive",
    "Hybrid",
    "Loss",
    "Delay",
    "Delay Variation",
    "Hashing",
    "Closed-Loop"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "HTML",
    "TXT",
    "PDF",
    "XML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [
      "RFC8889"
    ],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9342/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9342.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9342.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9342/"
  }
}