⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC · RFC9692

RFC9692 · RIFT: Routing in Fat Trees

RIFT: Routing in Fat Trees

This document defines a specialized, dynamic routing protocol for Clos, fat tree, and variants thereof. These topologies were initially used within crossbar interconnects and consequently router and switch backplanes, but their characteristics make them ideal for constructing IP fabrics as well. The protocol specified by this document is optimized towards the minimization of control plane state to support very large substrates as well as the minimization of configuration and operational complexity to allow for a simplified deployment of said topologies.

Официальная английская аннотация

This document defines a specialized, dynamic routing protocol for Clos, fat tree, and variants thereof. These topologies were initially used within crossbar interconnects and consequently router and switch backplanes, but their characteristics make them ideal for constructing IP fabrics as well. The protocol specified by this document is optimized towards the minimization of control plane state to support very large substrates as well as the minimization of configuration and operational complexity to allow for a simplified deployment of said topologies.

Связи документа

Официальный источник · 2025-04-01

Полные импортированные сведения карточки
{
  "id": "RFC9692",
  "number": 9692,
  "title_en": "RIFT: Routing in Fat Trees",
  "title_ru": "",
  "summary_ru": "",
  "purpose_ru": "",
  "use_ru": "",
  "full_translation_path": "",
  "full_translation_checked_at": "",
  "full_translation_source_sha256": "",
  "architect_note_ru": "",
  "topics_ru": [],
  "translation_state": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level": "not_prepared",
  "verification_level_ru": "Русская выжимка не подготовлена",
  "verification_note_ru": "",
  "abstract_en": "This document defines a specialized, dynamic routing protocol for Clos, fat tree, and variants thereof. These topologies were initially used within crossbar interconnects and consequently router and switch backplanes, but their characteristics make them ideal for constructing IP fabrics as well. The protocol specified by this document is optimized towards the minimization of control plane state to support very large substrates as well as the minimization of configuration and operational complexity to allow for a simplified deployment of said topologies.",
  "authors": [
    "T. Przygienda",
    "J. Head",
    "A. Sharma",
    "P. Thubert",
    "B. Rijsman",
    "D. Afanasiev"
  ],
  "organizations": [],
  "publication_date": "2025-04-01",
  "current_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "current_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "publication_status": "PROPOSED STANDARD",
  "publication_status_ru": "Предлагаемый стандарт",
  "lifecycle": "active",
  "lifecycle_ru": "Действующий",
  "stream": "IETF",
  "stream_ru": "IETF",
  "area": "rtg",
  "area_ru": "Маршрутизация",
  "working_group": "rift",
  "source_draft": "draft-ietf-rift-rift-24",
  "page_count": 150,
  "doi": "10.17487/RFC9692",
  "keywords": [
    "Routing protocol",
    "IGP",
    "Anisotropic routing",
    "Clos",
    "Fat tree",
    "Cloud",
    "Distance vector",
    "Link state",
    "Optimized flooding",
    "Zeroconf",
    "disaggregation",
    "fabric",
    "ZTP",
    "LIE",
    "TIE",
    "TIDE",
    "TIRE",
    "KV-TIE",
    "multi-plane",
    "ToF"
  ],
  "formats": [
    "HTML",
    "TXT",
    "PDF",
    "XML"
  ],
  "relations": {
    "obsoletes": [],
    "obsoleted_by": [],
    "updates": [],
    "updated_by": [],
    "is_also": [],
    "see_also": []
  },
  "links": {
    "info": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9692/",
    "html": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9692.html",
    "txt": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9692.txt",
    "datatracker": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9692/"
  }
}