⌕ Поиск по атласу

IETF · RFC

Опубликованные RFC, связи обновления и замены, официальные статусы и русские переводы.

Реестр · 9 842 документов

RFC34712003-02-01

Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description

Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description

This document describes extensions to Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) signaling required to support Generalized MPLS. Generalized MPLS extends the MPLS control plane to encompass time-division (e.g., Synchronous Optical Network and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, SONET/SDH), wavelength (optical lambdas) and spatial switching (e.g., incoming port or fiber to outgoing port or fiber). This docum…

RFC34702003-01-01

Руководство по использованию расширяемого языка разметки (XML) в протоколах IETF

Guidelines for the Use of Extensible Markup Language (XML) within IETF Protocols

RFC 3470 устанавливает лучшую современную практику использования XML в документах протоколов IETF, проходящих стандартизацию. Документ помогает выбрать XML с учётом расширяемости, интернационализации, типизации, производительности, объёма данных и альтернативных представлений. XML-элемент, определённый как XML, MUST быть корректно сформированным; документ, определяющий XML-элемент протокола, MUST …

Читать русский перевод →
RFC34692003-02-01

Framework for Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)-based Recovery

Framework for Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)-based Recovery

Multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) integrates the label swapping forwarding paradigm with network layer routing. To deliver reliable service, MPLS requires a set of procedures to provide protection of the traffic carried on different paths. This requires that the label switching routers (LSRs) support fault detection, fault notification, and fault recovery mechanisms, and that MPLS signaling su…

RFC34682003-02-01

The Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Working Group decision on MPLS signaling protocols

The Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Working Group decision on MPLS signaling protocols

This document documents the consensus reached by the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Working Group within the IETF to focus its efforts on "Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP)-TE: Extensions to RSVP for Label- Switched Paths (LSP) Tunnels" (RFC 3209) as the MPLS signalling protocol for traffic engineering applications and to undertake no new efforts relating to "Constraint-Based LSP Setup us…

RFC34672003-03-01

Role of the Domain Name System (DNS)

Role of the Domain Name System (DNS)

This document reviews the original function and purpose of the domain name system (DNS). It contrasts that history with some of the purposes for which the DNS has recently been applied and some of the newer demands being placed upon it or suggested for it. A framework for an alternative to placing these additional stresses on the DNS is then outlined. This document and that framework are not a pro…

RFC34662003-03-01

A Model for Content Internetworking (CDI)

A Model for Content Internetworking (CDI)

Content (distribution) internetworking (CDI) is the technology for interconnecting content networks, sometimes previously called "content peering" or "CDN peering". A common vocabulary helps the process of discussing such interconnection and interoperation. This document introduces content networks and content internetworking, and defines elements for such a common vocabulary. This memo provides i…

RFC34652003-02-01

TCP Congestion Control with Appropriate Byte Counting (ABC)

TCP Congestion Control with Appropriate Byte Counting (ABC)

This document proposes a small modification to the way TCP increases its congestion window. Rather than the traditional method of increasing the congestion window by a constant amount for each arriving acknowledgment, the document suggests basing the increase on the number of previously unacknowledged bytes each ACK covers. This change improves the performance of TCP, as well as closes a security …

RFC34642003-01-01

An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status Notifications

An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status Notifications

This memo defines a Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) content-type that may be used by a message transfer agent (MTA) or electronic mail gateway to report the result of an attempt to deliver a message to one or more recipients. This content-type is intended as a machine-processable replacement for the various types of delivery status notifications currently used in Internet electronic m…

RFC34632003-01-01

Enhanced Mail System Status Codes

Enhanced Mail System Status Codes

This document defines a set of extended status codes for use within the mail system for delivery status reports, tracking, and improved diagnostics. In combination with other information provided in the Delivery Status Notification (DSN) delivery report, these codes facilitate media and language independent rendering of message delivery status. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC34622003-01-01

The Multipart/Report Content Type for the Reporting of Mail System Administrative Messages

The Multipart/Report Content Type for the Reporting of Mail System Administrative Messages

The Multipart/Report Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) content-type is a general "family" or "container" type for electronic mail reports of any kind. Although this memo defines only the use of the Multipart/Report content-type with respect to delivery status reports, mail processing programs will benefit if a single content-type is used to for all kinds of reports. This document is par…

RFC34612003-01-01

Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications (DSNs)

Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications (DSNs)

This memo defines an extension to the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) service, which allows an SMTP client to specify (a) that Delivery Status Notifications (DSNs) should be generated under certain conditions, (b) whether such notifications should return the contents of the message, and (c) additional information, to be returned with a DSN, that allows the sender to identify both the recipien…

RFC34602003-01-01

Policy Core Information Model (PCIM) Extensions

Policy Core Information Model (PCIM) Extensions

This document specifies a number of changes to the Policy Core Information Model (PCIM, RFC 3060). Two types of changes are included. First, several completely new elements are introduced, for example, classes for header filtering, that extend PCIM into areas that it did not previously cover. Second, there are cases where elements of PCIM (for example, policy rule priorities) are deprecated, and r…

RFC34592003-01-01

Critical Content Multi-purpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Parameter

Critical Content Multi-purpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Parameter

This document describes the use of a mechanism for identifying body parts that a sender deems critical in a multi-part Internet mail message. The mechanism described is a parameter to Content-Disposition, as described by RFC 3204. By knowing what parts of a message the sender deems critical, a content gateway can intelligently handle multi-part messages when providing gateway services to systems o…

RFC34582003-01-01

Message Context for Internet Mail

Message Context for Internet Mail

This memo describes a new RFC 2822 message header, "Message-Context". This header provides information about the context and presentation characteristics of a message. A receiving user agent (UA) may use this information as a hint to optimally present the message. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

RFC34572003-01-01

Requirements for IPsec Remote Access Scenarios

Requirements for IPsec Remote Access Scenarios

IPsec offers much promise as a secure remote access mechanism. However, there are a number of differing remote access scenarios, each having some shared and some unique requirements. A thorough understanding of these requirements is necessary in order to effectively evaluate the suitability of a specific set of mechanisms for any particular remote access scenario. This document enumerates the requ…

RFC34562003-01-01

Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4) Configuration of IPsec Tunnel Mode

Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4) Configuration of IPsec Tunnel Mode

This memo explores the requirements for host configuration in IPsec tunnel mode, and describes how the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4) may be leveraged for configuration. In many remote access scenarios, a mechanism for making the remote host appear to be present on the local corporate network is quite useful. This may be accomplished by assigning the host a "virtual" address from the…

RFC34552003-01-01

Private Header (P-Header) Extensions to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for the 3rd-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)

Private Header (P-Header) Extensions to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for the 3rd-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)

This document describes a set of private Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) headers (P-headers) used by the 3rd-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), along with their applicability, which is limited to particular environments. The P-headers are for a variety of purposes within the networks that the partners use, including charging and information about the networks a call traverses. This memo prov…

RFC34542003-01-01

Preparation of Internationalized Strings ("stringprep")

Preparation of Internationalized Strings ("stringprep")

This document describes a framework for preparing Unicode text strings in order to increase the likelihood that string input and string comparison work in ways that make sense for typical users throughout the world. The stringprep protocol is useful for protocol identifier values, company and personal names, internationalized domain names, and other text strings. This document does not specify how…

RFC34532002-12-01

The Use of Forward Error Correction (FEC) in Reliable Multicast

The Use of Forward Error Correction (FEC) in Reliable Multicast

This memo describes the use of Forward Error Correction (FEC) codes to efficiently provide and/or augment reliability for one-to-many reliable data transport using IP multicast. One of the key properties of FEC codes in this context is the ability to use the same packets containing FEC data to simultaneously repair different packet loss patterns at multiple receivers. Different classes of FEC code…

RFC34522002-12-01

Forward Error Correction (FEC) Building Block

Forward Error Correction (FEC) Building Block

This document generally describes how to use Forward Error Correction (FEC) codes to efficiently provide and/or augment reliability for data transport. The primary focus of this document is the application of FEC codes to one-to-many reliable data transport using IP multicast. This document describes what information is needed to identify a specific FEC code, what information needs to be communica…

RFC34512002-12-01

Layered Coding Transport (LCT) Building Block

Layered Coding Transport (LCT) Building Block

Layered Coding Transport (LCT) provides transport level support for reliable content delivery and stream delivery protocols. LCT is specifically designed to support protocols using IP multicast, but also provides support to protocols that use unicast. LCT is compatible with congestion control that provides multiple rate delivery to receivers and is also compatible with coding techniques that provi…

RFC34502002-12-01

Asynchronous Layered Coding (ALC) Protocol Instantiation

Asynchronous Layered Coding (ALC) Protocol Instantiation

This document describes the Asynchronous Layered Coding (ALC) protocol, a massively scalable reliable content delivery protocol. Asynchronous Layered Coding combines the Layered Coding Transport (LCT) building block, a multiple rate congestion control building block and the Forward Error Correction (FEC) building block to provide congestion controlled reliable asynchronous delivery of content to a…

RFC34492002-12-01

Влияние асимметрии сетевого пути на производительность TCP

TCP Performance Implications of Network Path Asymmetry

RFC 3449 описывает ухудшение производительности TCP в сетях с асимметричными прямым и обратным путями, включая различия пропускной способности и влияние MAC-протоколов. Основная причина — несовершенная и изменчивая обратная связь ACK: ACK могут задерживаться, теряться, сжиматься во времени или поступать редко, что нарушает самотактирование TCP и вызывает всплески передачи. Документ рассматривает с…

Читать русский перевод →
RFC34482003-01-01

TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification

TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification

This document specifies TCP-Friendly Rate Control (TFRC). TFRC is a congestion control mechanism for unicast flows operating in a best- effort Internet environment. It is reasonably fair when competing for bandwidth with TCP flows, but has a much lower variation of throughput over time compared with TCP, making it more suitable for applications such as telephony or streaming media where a relative…

RFC34472003-02-01

Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.1

Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.1

This memo represents a republication of PKCS #1 v2.1 from RSA Laboratories' Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) series, and change control is retained within the PKCS process. The body of this document is taken directly from the PKCS #1 v2.1 document, with certain corrections made during the publication process. This memo provides information for the Internet community.

RFC34462003-01-01

Anycast Rendevous Point (RP) mechanism using Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) and Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP)

Anycast Rendevous Point (RP) mechanism using Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) and Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP)

This document describes a mechanism to allow for an arbitrary number of Rendevous Points (RPs) per group in a single shared-tree Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) domain. This memo provides information for the Internet community.

RFC34452002-12-01

Limiting the Scope of the KEY Resource Record (RR)

Limiting the Scope of the KEY Resource Record (RR)

This document limits the Domain Name System (DNS) KEY Resource Record (RR) to only keys used by the Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC). The original KEY RR used sub-typing to store both DNSSEC keys and arbitrary application keys. Storing both DNSSEC and application keys with the same record type is a mistake. This document removes application keys from the KEY record by redefining the…

RFC34442003-01-01

On the Difference between Information Models and Data Models

On the Difference between Information Models and Data Models

There has been ongoing confusion about the differences between Information Models and Data Models for defining managed objects in network management. This document explains the differences between these terms by analyzing how existing network management model specifications (from the IETF and other bodies such as the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) or the Distributed Management Task Fo…

RFC34432003-01-01

Time To Live (TTL) Processing in Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Networks

Time To Live (TTL) Processing in Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Networks

This document describes Time To Live (TTL) processing in hierarchical Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) networks and is motivated by the need to formalize a TTL-transparent mode of operation for an MPLS label-switched path. It updates RFC 3032, "MPLS Label Stack Encoding". TTL processing in both Pipe and Uniform Model hierarchical tunnels are specified with examples for both "push" and "pop" c…

RFC34422002-12-01

The Classless Static Route Option for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 4

The Classless Static Route Option for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 4

This document defines a new Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) option which is passed from the DHCP Server to the DHCP Client to configure a list of static routes in the client. The network destinations in these routes are classless - each routing table entry includes a subnet mask. [STANDARDS-TRACK]